How much more will it cost to build an eco home? The answer isn't as clear cut as you might think
If your self build design is based on an eco-led approach, the chances are you'll need deeper pockets, but here's why it's worth the investment upfront
Bring your dream home to life with expert advice, how to guides and design inspiration. Sign up for our newsletter and get two free tickets to a Homebuilding & Renovating Show near you.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Whenever someone asks me how much extra it costs to build an eco home, I usually pause before answering. Not because I’m avoiding the question, but because the honest answer is “it depends”.
Eco homes sit on a broad spectrum, from sensible fabric-first approaches intended to reduce energy bills, right through to full Passivhaus certification, where every junction and air change is measured and verified.
Having built projects across that spectrum, what I can say is that building an eco home is rarely about one big expensive decision. It’s a series of choices that nudge the budget up in some places, pull it back down in others, and fundamentally change how the building performs over its lifetime.
The eco premium and where it comes from
Compared to standard new build costs, designed only to scrape through building regulations, an eco home will usually cost somewhere between 5% and 20% more to construct. It’s a wide range driven by the vast range of options, ranging from a house with thicker insulation, better windows and a heat pump, to a fully certified Passivhaus, with exceptionally low airtightness, minimal thermal bridging and full of certified products guaranteed to deliver an exceptional performance.
The biggest driver of cost is the building fabric itself. Eco homes depend on insulation and airtightness to do most of the heavy lifting. This means thicker walls, deeper roofs and floors, and much better-performing windows and doors. None of these tend to be individually shocking in terms of cost, but together they add up.
Triple glazing costs, for example, are noticeably more expensive than standard double glazing, and anything that’s certified to achieve a particularly exceptional performance can cost several times more than a basic component.
Airtightness is another area where costs creep in. Achieving low levels of air leakage requires careful detailing, specialist tapes, membranes and more time on site. This isn’t something you can rush or leave as an afterthought, and the key is to ensure that trades understand what they’re building, and why it matters. On projects where airtightness is managed from day one, with well thought through design, the cost impact is manageable. Where it’s treated as an afterthought, it quickly becomes difficult and very expensive.
Bring your dream home to life with expert advice, how to guides and design inspiration. Sign up for our newsletter and get two free tickets to a Homebuilding & Renovating Show near you.
Once you build an airtight home, home ventilation becomes essential. Mechanical Ventilation with Heat Recovery (MVHR), is the go to solution for most eco homes. These systems aren’t cheap, but they are efficient and highly effective. Ductwork needs space, coordination and the system as a whole requires careful commissioning. Cutting corners can save money but tends to bite back later, either through noise, poor airflow, or systems that simply don’t perform.
Renewable technologies are another common feature of eco homes. In recent years, solar PV has come down significantly in price and is now one of the most cost-effective upgrades you can make. Heat pumps, whether air source or ground source, are still more expensive than gas boilers, but with the support of government grants they’re now the mainstream option to heat a new home.
What really influences the final cost
One of the biggest influences on cost is the build route you choose. Adding eco features to a traditional masonry build is perfectly possible, but it can be the hardest way to achieve very high performance. You’re often fighting against standard details and traditional building practices, that will add labour cost and risk.
Timber frame and SIPs systems tend to lend themselves more naturally to eco construction. They’re inherently airtight, quick to erect and well suited to high levels of insulation. The material cost can be higher, but the speed on site often balances this out by reducing labour and site running costs. As a weather resilient build system, along with shorter build programmes, building with timber can also reduce exposure to weather related delays.
At the top end of the eco spectrum sits the Passivhaus standard. Achieving it typically adds 10 – 25% to build costs, depending on design and location. The rewards are an exceptionally low energy demand and a very stable internal environment, but it’s not a standard to opt for lightly. It requires commitment from the entire design and build team, and a client who understands that precision matters. For some projects it makes perfect sense, but for others, a near-Passive approach without formal certification offers the best balance of cost and performance.
Architectural complexity has a large impact on the cost of building an eco home as well. Simple, compact architectural forms are cheaper to build, and easier to insulate and seal. Every corner, junction and roofline creates complexity and the potential of heat loss. From an eco perspective, a straightforward shape isn’t just cheaper, it’s better.
Location also plays its part in the cost to build. Labour costs vary across the UK, and specialist manufacturers of high performance build systems, or specialist installers of MVHR or heat pumps can be in short supply and more expensive. This in turn will push prices up, so it’s worth checking availability early, something you can do by visiting one of our Homebuilding & Renovating self build shows and speaking to installers.
The long-term financial picture and why it matters
However, while upfront cost is only part of the story, and often the part that gets the most attention, where eco homes really start to justify themselves is in their running costs. A well designed eco home can reduce energy bills by up to 90% compared to an older, poorly insulated property. Even against a modern standard new build, compliant with current regs, the difference can be substantial.
I’ve built houses where the annual heating bill is less than £100 per year, which fundamentally changes how people feel about their homes. As a result of the highly tuned design and attention to detail throughout the build phase, there’s no hesitation about turning the heating on, and no nasty surprises when the energy bill lands. That peace of mind has a value that’s hard to quantify, and quite often the reason why people build eco.
There’s also an increasing link between energy efficiency and property values. Homes with low running costs and strong EPC ratings tend to be more attractive to buyers, particularly as energy prices remain volatile. Some lenders now offer green mortgages, with preferential rates for highly efficient homes, reflecting the lower risk offered by a well-built, energy efficient home.
Maintenance is another area where eco homes can look financially attractive. Managing moisture movement through airtight construction, and avoiding complex heating systems with lots of moving parts, all contribute to lower running costs. This doesn’t mean that eco homes are maintenance-free, but they’re often more predictable and forgiving over time.
Budgeting properly and avoiding nasty surprises
Because eco homes are more technical with tighter tolerances, it’s sensible to carry a larger contingency than a straightforward build. I usually advise between 10% – 15% to help cover the cost leakage that comes with specific detailing and higher quality standards. Where unfamiliar construction methods are involved, the contingency should be increased, especially where trades are unfamiliar with what they’re building.
Incentives and grants can help, but shouldn’t be relied on to make the numbers stack up. Schemes change regularly, and eligibility criteria can be frustratingly specific. At the moment, support for renewable technologies such as heat pumps through the Boiler Upgrade Scheme can make a meaningful contribution, but it’s best treated as a bonus, just in case the scheme is withdrawn.
The most cost-effective eco homes I’ve built aren’t the ones with the longest list of eco technologies. They’re the ones where the basics are done exceptionally well. A well insulated, airtight house with sensible glazing and a simple heating system will usually cost less and outperform a more complex house that relies on bolt-on technology to compensate for a weak building fabric.
There’s no escaping the fact that building an eco home will cost more than a standard building regs compliant house, but not always as much as people fear. When you focus on high quality architectural design that delivers a fabric first approach, without having to compensate with expensive eco technologies, there’s no reason for the eco premium to become unaffordable.
Wondering what the design of an eco home could look like? Be inspired by these real-life eco homes, and take a look at some of the latest green home innovations you could consider for your self build or home renovation project.
Mark Stevenson is a construction professional with almost 35 years’ experience across housebuilding, timber systems manufacturing and bespoke residential development. He is the owner of Elsworth Projects Ltd, a consultancy specialising in the project management of bespoke self-build homes.
Previously Managing Director of Potton and former Chair of NaCSBA and the Structural Timber Association, Mark is widely recognised for his specialist knowledge of timber construction, land finding and appraisal, and the construction of self-build projects.
Alongside his professional career, Mark is a skilled joiner, hands-on renovator and serial self-builder. He regularly shares his knowledge at Homebuilding & Renovating Shows and coaches self-builders.

