What went wrong at King Charles-backed £1.2bn eco village that sits empty 13 years after the homes were built?

The entrance to the Coed Darcy eco home project
The Coed Darcy eco village is said to be like a ghost town (Image credit: Google Earth)

Coed Darcy was planned as a £1.2bn eco village inspired by King Charles’ model at Poundbury, with thousands of homes, schools and shops designed to create a self-contained community.

Thirteen years later, only a fraction of the homes have been built, and a small test hamlet of nine mock-Georgian eco homes remains completely unoccupied.

The stalled project raises questions about the practical challenges of delivering sustainable housing at scale and what lessons can be applied to future eco developments.

What was built in the eco village?

In 2013, a test hamlet of nine Georgian-style eco homes was completed on the Coed Darcy site in South Wales, on land formerly occupied by an oil refinery near Port Talbot. These homes were designed to showcase sustainable construction methods.

Beyond the hamlet, around 294 homes were eventually built, but key community facilities such as schools, shops, and medical services were not delivered.

The test homes now stand discoloured, partially boarded up, and isolated from the rest of the village by undeveloped land, creating a striking image of empty streets in a project intended to demonstrate sustainable living.

Why did the project fail?

King Charles attends a charity event at Dumfries House

The homes were backed by the Prince’s Foundation for Building Community (King Charles' charitable organisation) (Image credit: Getty Images)

Several factors prevented Coed Darcy from becoming the thriving eco community it was designed to be.

Filmmaker Jay Curtis, who documented the deserted hamlet with a drone, described the scene as “like a village that time forgot” and said “it just looked completely abandoned.”

He compared it to a post-apocalyptic film set and added: “There’s no real clear answer… to have that level of hype, a Royal visit, and such ambition – and then to see it all just left – it amazes people. These are big, expensive homes. There are a lot of them. And no one ever moved in.”

While a small number of homes were built, essential amenities such as schools, shops, and healthcare were never completed, making it impractical for residents to move in.

Broader economic challenges and long planning permission processes also delayed construction, and revisions to the masterplan scaled back the number of homes, leaving parts of the site undeveloped.

Lessons for future eco homes

Coed Darcy illustrates the importance of combining sustainable construction with functional, liveable communities.

For eco housing to succeed, homes must be accompanied by accessible amenities so residents can live and work locally, reflecting the principles of a 15-minute neighbourhood.

The project also shows that ambitious design must be balanced with practical delivery and phased construction. Future eco villages can learn from Coed Darcy by ensuring that housing, infrastructure, and community facilities are ready for occupation, creating communities that are truly sustainable and attractive to residents.

Joseph Mullane
News Editor

News Editor Joseph has previously written for Today’s Media and Chambers & Partners, focusing on news for conveyancers and industry professionals.  Joseph has just started his own self build project, building his own home on his family’s farm with planning permission for a timber frame, three-bedroom house in a one-acre field. The foundation work has already begun and he hopes to have the home built in the next year. Prior to this he renovated his family's home as well as doing several DIY projects, including installing a shower, building sheds, and livestock fences and shelters for the farm’s animals. Outside of homebuilding, Joseph loves rugby and has written for Rugby World, the world’s largest rugby magazine.