Building in the Countryside: Drainage and Water
Provisions for drainage and fresh water are essential in any new home, but a countryside plot can present complications which will require resorting to an off-mains solution such as a septic tank, cesspool or reed bed.
ABOVE: Installing a bio-digester sewage treatment plant (read more below).
Drainage should be a high priority when assessing a rural plot, and if it’s not evident you’d be wise to make enquiries as to whether provisions are already in place. If not, a solution needs to be sought from the outset, with plans for drainage provision submitted with your planning application.
Local authorities encourage mains connection if your new home is within 30m (100ft) of a public drain — the standard connection charge is £245 in England and Wales. However, both gravity and distance can work against you on rural plots. It’s worth exploring your options to pump sewage – using a package pump system – to the mains first. You’ll need expert help to calculate the right system for your site. Things become more complex when the location of the nearest drain will mean the highway needs to be dug up to make a connection — the costs of which can be excessive and can outweigh off mains (SEE BELOW).
Clean water is a necessity for any new house, but connection will depend on your location. In England and Wales mains connection is via the local water board and, as such, costs vary considerably. In Scotland and Northern Ireland, however, publicly owned water companies mean standardised charges. Scottish Water’s connection fee is £302.70, but you’ll also be subject to an infrastructure charge of £288.50 (scottishwater.co.uk). With Northern Ireland Water standard connection is £216 with an infrastructure charge of £263 (niwater.com). As with drainage connections, you’ll also have to factor in additional funds for excavation, pipes etc.*
Around 25,000 UK homes are not connected to mains water, according to DEFRA. Alternatives include sourcing water from springs and wells or installing a borehole. The capital costs associated with these off-mains options are high, but if you intend to live in the property for the foreseeable future, then you’ll benefit from low running costs. To install a borehole you’ll first need a survey from the British Geological Survey, costing £352 incl VAT. This will “provide a rating as to how cost-effective a borehole would be,” states Mark Jenning of Synergy Boreholes (synergyboreholes.co.uk). Installation costs between £5,000-16,000, but factor in an additional £3,000 for equipment for drinking water — which will require regular inspection.
Consent to Discharge
If there’s a watercourse nearby you may be able to discharge treated effluent, but you must first obtain a Consent to Discharge. In England and Wales this is granted by the Environment Agency (0870 850 6506) — the application charge is £124. In Northern Ireland, through the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development’s Rivers Agency (riversagencyni.gov.uk), the application charge is £110. In Scotland the online fee is £76 with the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (sepa.org.uk).
"It truly was primitive"
John Hughes and Harriet Wilson’s isolated plot in Exmoor National Park was originally home to a derelict wooden chalet with no mains services. “The old chap sourced his drinking water from the stream,” says Harriet. “It truly was primitive.” Water for their new home (BELOW) is now provided via a borehole, and supplemented by a rainwater harvesting system. The home also boasts a bio-digester sewage treatment plant (on site MAIN IMAGE) — “Which is ideal as we didn’t require a Consent to Discharge for it,” Harriet comments.
The family decided against oil and LPG — PV cells and a ground-source heat pump provide hot water and heating for the house. “If you’re building a new house, it’s worth putting in renewables from the start: they pay for themselves almost immediately,” advises Harriet.
Off-Mains Drainage Solutions
Septic Tanks: This unit (BELOW) separates solids – which are slowly broken down – from liquids (effluent) which are discharged, then filtered via a soakaway or drainage field. The tank provides limited treatment – containing around 70% of the waste which first entered it – meaning annual ‘desludging’ will be required (at about £75 a time).
The capital costs are high. A 3,800-litre tank together with a 45m soakaway – suitable for a household of four – will cost £5,200 to purchase and install, according to Kingspan Environmental (kingspan.com).
The tank and drainage field will need to be located a minimum distance from both the house and any nearby water courses. A trial hole and percolation test will also need to be carried out first to assess whether your site is suitable — areas with heavy clay soils, a high water table or bedrock are often not. You may also require a Consent to Discharge (SEE ABOVE).
Cesspools: Cesspools only collect waste and as such require frequent emptying – around £50-80 each visit – meaning running costs are high. They’re even banned under Scottish Building Regulations.
Treatment Plants: Package sewage treatment plants provide superior results, as Mike Norton, Technical Director of Kingspan Environ - mental, states: “If you want to be safe and, frankly, more environmentally friendly, install a sewage treatment plant — which will remove 90-95% of sewage pollutants without relying on a soakaway to do half the job.” They cost approx £5,700 to buy and install.
Some models are powered by electricity – increasing the cost of utility bills – though models which harness wind and solar power are also available.
You’ll also need to consider the cost of regular servicing, as well as desludging, meaning they’re more expensive to run than septic tanks. But remember that while septic tanks may provide the cheaper and easier solution, they are not necessarily the best option.
Reed Beds: Reed beds provide an eco alternative for treating effluent — and may be a prerequisite for a Consent to Discharge. The horizontal reed bed is currently the most common, but you’ll require a considerable area to accommodate one. The vertical flow reed bed requires less space, but you’ll need to dig down deeper to enable waste to filter through.
The capital costs – upwards of £15,000 – are high. Weeding and maintenance will also be required to ensure the reeds remain the dominant species.
Rainwater Harvesting: Whether you rely on mains or an off-mains alternative for water, it is well worth investing in rainwater harvesting — which can reduce your reliance on your principal source by up to 50%. Rainwater harvesting ranges from the simple rain butt for garden use, to sophisticated systems which collect, cleanse, store and pump water into the home for use in appliances.
Systems are becoming more affordable and, according to Adrian Lester, Partner and General Manger of rainwaterharvesting.co.uk, “The prices have come down for the bigger kits — from £4,000 to more like £2,500. For a small house, £1,500 will enable you to flush the toilet and wash your clothes with water off your own roof.” Adrian also recommends that “the best time to install rainwater harvesting is at build stage when the earthmovers are already on site”.
How to self build in the countryside:
Further reading:
- Author
- Claire Lloyd
- Issue date:
- November 2009
Useful links
- Allerton
- Biodigester
- Off-mains solutions
- Biorock
- Off-mains solutions
- Biotank
- Off-mains solutions
- Combined Harvesters
- Rainwater harvesting
- JWD Rainwater Systems Ltd
- Rainwater harvesting
- Klargester
- Off-mains solutions
- Rainwater Products Ltd
- Rainwater harvesting
- UK Rainwater Harvesting Association (UKRHA)
- Rainwater harvesting
- WB & AD Morgan
- Rainwater harvesting
- WPL Ltd
- Off-mains solutions
Why Septic Tank Systems, Cesspools and Reedbeds may not be the best choice
Septic Tanks require emptying annually at a cost of around £180 in most areas.
With the maximum Percolation Value of 100, the length of soakaway pipe required in a 600mm. trench is 133M, which at £25 per metre is £3333.00.
Soakaways do not last forever. On average, a soakaway should last between 5 and 15 years and when it clogs up, it will require replaciment in a different part of the garden. Many houses do not have enought spare land for this as the soakaway cannot be installed under roads, drives, paths, etc. and must be at least 15 metres from any building.
Cesspool waste is charged at around £150 per 4500L removal and as the average family of 4 will produce over 32,000 litres every 45 days (the minimum storage time capacity allowed by Building Control) this will cost over £1000 to empty every 6 weeks or so.
Reedbeds are not a 'fit and forget' item. They need careful gardening and weeding and the 'gardener' requires multiple annual vaccinations to protect against the pathogens in the wastewater.
The sewage treatment plant can be a non-electric BIOROCK plant and can discharge directly to a ditch or stream, with a Consent from the Environment Agency, saving £3000 on soakaway cost.
As the BIOROCK only requires emptying every 4 years, it is much cheaper to run than a septic tank and the effluent is nearly 80 times cleaner.
It is obvious that non-electric sewage treatment plants are the Future for sewage treatment
Six years ago, I was talking to an old lady who had retired into our village 15 years earlier. She lived by herself and had the minimum size septic tank, which she had emptied every year.
This made me very angry, that not once over those 15 years had the people who emptied her tank and took her money had the decency to tell her that she was wasting her money.
Many people live by themselves, there are many couples, these people do not need their septic tank emptied every year.
It is a fact that many peoples livelihood relies on the installation, maintenance and emptying of septic tanks........can we not have some facts, some honesty?
Non-Electric Sewage Treatment Plants - Where is Kingspan???
I would have thought that the Biorock would have had some competition by now!
It has been in the UK for over a year and is still the only non-electric sustainable plant available.
Come on Mike Norton, get your Kingspan R & D team working on it, otherwise, Biorock have the monopoly on all future off-mains Eco Builds. No-one is going to buy an electric plant in 10 years time, are they!
if i was klargester, i wpouldnt worry about the competition of the Biorock, its not all plain sailing, what people dont tell you is that it does require electric unless you live on a hill that has a lower level of 3m!!!!!! if your drainage field blocks up try a Pirana unit, now thats sonthing else!!
We should reduce our water, energy and nature consumption in order to preserve our resources for our future.
'Sustainable Building' above is right. At the moment, Biorock has the monopoly on non-electric sustainable sewage treatment plants as it is the only one.
It would be great to see more non-electric Filter System plants on the market and have some real competition for the Biorock.
Usually, when a revolutionary new product is released, it is copied almost immediately by other manufacturers in one form or another. I agree with 'Sustainable Building'. It is amazing that other manufacturers haven't realised the huge potential and market for non-electric sewage treatment.
Changes in the Sewage Treatment Regulations - incorrect info
The article states that the bio-digester does not require a Consent to Discharge from the Environment Agency. IT DOES NOW.
Under the new EPP2 Permit rules, ALL sewage treatment plants and septic tanks must be registered with the E.A. for either a Permit or a Permit Exemption. The plants installed must also have been tested and certifed under the EN 12566-3 2005 and hold the Certificate to prove it in order to comply with the registration above.
The sewage treatment plant in the photo is not currently on the 'British Water Certified Sewage Treatment Plant List' (I refer to the photo of the installation, not to the Klargester.)
Always INSIST on seeing the EN 12566-3 2005 Test Certificate BEFORE you buy a plant to make sure that it complies with the EPP2 Permit regulations.
people say why havent others copied the Biorock, well ask yourself the same question, possibly the big reason is, problems, is it stable? im not to sure it is, in many ways. filtration was carried out by way of clinker beds, but these are being moved out by the sewage undertaker who treat the water, and aeration is being used, so if filtration was the best way, why are they moving away from it??
as for the EPP, CHECK IT ALL oUT AGAIN, the EA are in talks with the Goverment and Defra, they are telling people NOT to apply for exemption at the moment, but the possibility of removing the need to apply for it.
check their website under section 11. The EA also require mainly on units complying with British Standards too. remember, its up to the end user to comply and discharge effluent quality water, not the manufactures.
Test certificates, only indicate under test conditions, not real life!! plants normaly fail due to what is being discharged in to them and bad maintanance. EEP2, look it up under section 11
Post new comment
|
Subscribe today to receive great savings on Homebuilding & Renovating magazine Sign up today become a member of Homebuilding.co.uk for FREE and benefit from access to forums, commenting, member groups and blogs Click here to receive the FREE Homebuilding.co.uk newsletter |


The complete home improvement magazine



Centaur Special Interest Media, Ascent Publishing Ltd, 2 Sugar Brook Court, Aston Road, Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, B60 3EX. Tel: 01527 834435