How to Achieve Self-build Success
Self-building needs a mix of many qualities, but are you cut out for the challenge ahead?
How to Achieve Self-build Success
Self-building needs a mix of many qualities, but are you cut out for the challenge ahead?
Estimating Service -NEW from Homebuilding & Renovating. Find out how much your self-build is going to cost!
Design Ideas for Sloping Sites
A look at the design implications of building your own home on a sloping site
I wonder whether you’ve been involved with a listed building, or had dealings with a house in a Conservation Area. Many of you will have done. There are over 10,000 Conservation Areas dotted around the country, and nearly 500,000 listed buildings. That’s a phenomenal number — it means that almost one in 30 UK homes has an extra layer of control, over and above normal planning permission.
And it’s not just homes — building plots can be listed too. If you create a plot from the garden of a listed building then any plans for a new house will have to tickle the fancy of the conservation officer, as well as the local planning committee. And unlike the local planning committee, conservation officers are unelected and their word is sacrosanct. If you want to make changes or just simply repairs to a listed building, you more or less have to do whatever the relevant official says — however expensive or unreasonable this may appear to be.
How did this all come to pass? The idea of protecting buildings from their owners started in the 1930s, when lots of aristos were having trouble keeping their family piles up to par. Added to this, death duties, which often made it impossible to pass down the estate from the 16th to the 17th Earl, meant that rather than give everything to the National Trust, some of the more unscrupulous owners simply knocked their houses down. There was a national outcry to protect these venerable buildings from such acts of financial vandalism.
But what started as a way of protecting ancient monuments has slowly grown to become an enormous edifice in its own right. Listing is split into three grades and the lowest designation usually applies to just about any building of vernacular interest, such as thatched cottages. Most pre- Victorian structures are now listed and an increasing number of modern buildings are also getting the treatment.
In England, the whole process is overseen by English Heritage (similar bodies exist for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) — an enormous quango with a budget of £180,000,000 per annum and a payroll of 2,000. Visit its website and you may easily mistake it for the National Trust. But, whereas the National Trust is a charity, pure and simple, English Heritage is an arm of the Government and if you disobey its listed building procedures you could end up in court and be ordered to pay a fine, or even face a prison sentence.
So whilst we can all see the value of preserving our heritage, many owners of older properties are both resentful and suspicious of this unaccountable, unelected body which has, in effect, become the architectural heritage police. And whilst English Heritage has undoubtedly accumulated a lot of expertise over the years, its judgements are, however, sometimes questionable.
In March, English Heritage hit the headlines over this very issue. It was accused of abusing its position, recommending products from manufacturers who also happen to be sponsors. To be fair, it’s a charge it vehemently denies — it says it has a series of systems in place which effectively separate the fundraising side of the enterprise from its conservation directives. However, the bad publicity adds to a groundswell of discontent that’s already well established. English Heritage might present itself as a friendly, benign organisation, battling to preserve what is best in this country’s architectural heritage, but a lot of indignant listed building owners would beg to differ.
There has never really been a debate about which homes should and should not be preserved, and who should be responsible. It’s just assumed that conservation is a good thing and that the more we conserve, the better. However, the heavy hand of the state is being rolled out ever wider to enforce conservation — the costs of which (including those to homeowners) are often astronomical. Furthermore, there are now tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of listed houses which the public has no access to and, in many cases, are not even visible from the public highway. Who exactly, if anyone, are these buildings being preserved for?
Mark Brinkley is a former commercial housebuilder and is the author of The Housebuilder’s Bible. He is commencing his second self-build project.
I have a Grade II listed farmhouse. It was formerly Grade III and have photos of total dereliction showing evidence of no windows; just openings. In the 1960's plastic sliding windows (i.e. two layers of secondary glazing - no bars or handles etc.) were inserted into the 17 openings with 22 sq metres of glass, and we wish to change them. My District Council has refused hand-made wooden 16mm double glazing(which they agreed to for a new sun-room 8 years ago). The house is situated in the centre of a golf course and I have demonstrated complaints from former owners and ourselves of stray golf balls and insurance claims, together with industrial grass-cutters, tractors and chainsaws starting at 5.30am.
I have demonstrated that another Grade II listed farmhouse closeby (NOT formerly Grade III), which is smaller and has less windows and glass area, was granted pvc/aluminium double glazing replacement windows. This property had perfectly good single-glazed wooden windows and was granted on the basis of energy conservation alone. The comment I received from our District Council is as follows:
'It appears that these were originally granted consent in 1986, pre-dating the detailed guidance on works to Listed Buildings provided by PPG 15 and the guidance set out in Circular 8/87 (Historic Buildings and Conservation Areas - Policy and Procedures). An application for listed building consent to replace two timber bay windows with white finished aluminimu double-glazed windows was refused in 1995, on grounds of the detrimental impact upon the historic character and appearance of the listed building. A further application was made in 1996 and, although Officers recommended refusal, the Local Committee granted consent'.
They further state: ' In order to meet your concerns about noise and security, you could consider the installation of single glazed windows with secondary glazing'.
I have claimed that the District Council is showing bias and preferential treatment to one house-owner. I was under the impression that Council's were obliged to treat people equally.
Your comments and advice on what to do next would be appreciated.