The Reader's Choice Finalists for the Daily Telegraph Homebuilding & Renovating Awards 2009
Voting has now closed for this year.
A big thank you to all who took the time to get involved and voted for their favourite home. The winner of the Reader's Choice Award 2009 will be revealled in the January issue of Homebuilding & Renovating magazine (Pre-order your copy of this issue now).
However, you can still look at the videos of each of the finalists homes and comment on which home you think should be the winner...
House One:
Winner of the Reader's Choice Remodelling & Extension Scheme Category.
Remodelling and extension of a 1960s home, Nottinghamshire. Read more about this house.
House Two:
Winner of the Reader's Choice Contemporary Self-build Category.
Contemporary eco-friendly self-build, Cornwall. Read more about this house.
House Three:
Winner of the Reader's Choice Conversions and Renovations Category.
Renovation and extension of a Georgian Home, Spitalfields. Read more about this house.
House Four:
Winner of the Reader's Choice Traditional Self-build Category.
Oak framed traditional self-build, Cheshire. Read more about this house.
House Five:
Winner of the Reader's Choice Renovations Category.
Extension and remodel of a 1930s bungalow, Preston. Read more about this house.


Centaur Special Interest Media, Ascent Publishing Ltd, 2 Sugar Brook Court, Aston Road, Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, B60 3EX. Tel: 01527 834400
Readers Choice Winner (Self-Build Home)
In my opinion house 4 was by far the best property. It has loads of character and was an energy efficient self-build. This oak framed home is the embodiment of sustainable development and integrates beautifully into the environment.
Hardly a level playing field!
Some really nice houses in the final five - but how can it be fair that the builders of house number four are allowed to sponsor the awards and enter it. It doesn't give an impression of impartiality if one of the sponsors has also won an award for two years running.
I wonder what the other timber framed houses who entered looked like and if the other people who went to the bother of entering are upset about it when they probably had no chance up against the sponsors of the event?
House number three gets my vote!
Vested interests at work?
Aaaaagh! We agonised over this one (my fellow judges and I) for a long time. It does indeed look more than suspicious that a project has been shortlisted in a category which is sponsored by the major supplier involved. All I can do is to try and reassure you that the commercial interest was not a factor in selecting this project for the shortlist. In fact, the contrary is true: we were very close to not shortlisting the project because of the way it could look and ultimately decided that positive discrimination would be unfair to the owners who are, afterall, the recipient of the prize, not the suppliers.
The awards entry rules do not currently ban entries where there is a commercial conflict/interest because the entrant have used products or services supplied by the category sponsors. Such a rule might seem to make sense, but would potentially eliminate a great deal of sponsorship opportunties and then there would be no awards!
What would be ideal is to have one big sponsor who is not directly related to the homebuilding industry but which is closely aligned - perhaps an energy company, or one of the state owned banks?!! Then there would be no direct conflict of interest. Worth further discussion though.
Homebuilding & Renovating Awards 2009
Could you name the architects and could they explain their design??
Architect's Names
All of the architects details will appear in the January Awards issue of the magazine together with a great deal more information on the projects including floorplans, costs and suppliers details. There are also architect's comments on many of the projects. We would welcome all of the other architects to add their comments and views on their work and the other shortlisted entries by using the comment and blog posts online at www.homebuilding.co.uk/awards.
The more the better.
Post new comment